My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-06-05
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
2000-06-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2002 4:36:32 PM
Creation date
8/16/2002 2:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
6/5/2000
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
98 <br /> <br /> Mr. O'ConnelI said that the third recommendation is to adopt a resolution <br />challenging employers in the Charlottesville area to pay all their employees a minimum <br />of $8 an hour. <br /> <br />Ms. Richards asked if there is a way to recognize employers who do this. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he thinks it is an excellent idea for the City to recognize employers <br />who' agree to this. Mr. Cox said he would like to know how many employers are akeady <br />paying $8 an hour. Mr. Cox suggested recognizing businesses at each Council meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Daugherty asked staff to come up with a way to find out about this. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano said he supports the resolution, but is concerned that recognizing all <br />employers who pay $8 an hour will put staffon a task that could be very time consuming. <br />Instead, Mr. Toscano suggested that such recognitions be left with the groups who have <br />mobilized. <br /> <br />Mr. Cox agreed and said that businesses could voluntarily come forward. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards suggested that volunteers could be enlisted to do research and <br />recognition of the businesses who agree. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Cox, seconded by Mr. Caravati, the resolution challenging <br />Charlottesville area businesses to pay their employees a living wage was approved by the <br />following vote. Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Mr. Cox, Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Richards, Mr. <br />Toscano. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of Charlottesville and its <br />residents to have employment available that will provide to all persons an opportunity to <br />earn a "Living Wage" sufficient to meet their basic living needs; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the City has amended its own pay plan to provide that no employee <br />of the City of Charlottesville will be paid a wage less than eight dollars ($8.00) per hour; <br />and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, case studies have shown that higher wages paid to employees lead <br />to more efficient production, lower employee turnover, improvement in the quality of job <br />applicants and performance, and improved morale within the workplace, and that such <br />efficiency gains can be expected to offset the labor costs associated with payment of a <br />Living Wage; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this City Council hereby <br />challenges all employers within the Charlottesville area to follow the City's lead, by <br />offering ali employees a wage of at least eight dollars ($8.00) per hour. <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell said that the fourth area, the ordinance requiring contract <br />employees to pay a living wage, raises policy issues, and said that direction is needed <br />from Council. <br /> <br /> Ms. Lisa Kelley, Assistant City Attorney, said that she has looked at what other <br />communities have adopted, and they are all outside of Virginia. The City of Alexandria <br />is in the process of drafting an ordinance. Ms. Kelley suggested that Council mull over <br />the information provided and provide input. Ms, Kelly asked that Councilors give careful <br />consideration to 1) what contracts would they have the ordinance apply to, noting that <br />depending on this it could have major financial implications for the City; and 2) how <br />could the ordinance be enforced, noting that this could take a lot of time adrnixdstratively. <br />Ms. Kelley said that the City Attorney's office has given the opinion that they have found <br />no legal authority for the City to enact such an ordinance. Ms. Kelly said that the <br />Purchasing Agent sent out surveys to vendors and only received a small response back. <br />Ms. Kelly noted that two of the responses, who were from small and minority businesses, <br />said that enacting such an ordinance would either increase the cost to the City or would <br />prevent them from doing business with the City. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.