My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008 Parking Study Final Report
Charlottesville
>
Economic Development
>
Parking
>
Parking Studies
>
2008 Parking Study Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2019 4:32:26 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 3:59:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ii <br />more. Both of these groups are a problem, because they are not using the two-hour spaces as intended. <br />Although these are a relatively small proportion of the vehicles, their all-day presence gives them a <br />disproportionate impact on parking occupancy. At the busiest times of day, more than 30% of the two- <br />hour spaces are occupied by these people. Without them, occupancy of the two-hour spaces would not <br />have exceeded 75% at any time. <br />Data confirms the suspicion that commuters (or other long-stay visitors) are creating a problem for <br />short-stay visitors. The Stakeholder Group agreed that there should be a goal to encourage commuters <br />out of the two-hour spaces, to free-up the supply for shoppers and visitors. There are easily enough <br />spaces vacant in downtown to accommodate these commuters if they switch from two-hour spaces to <br />other on-street or off-street spaces. The potential concerns have been about the cost penalty (if they <br />switch to off-street spaces) or time penalty (if they switch to either off-street spaces or peripheral on- <br />street spaces). The time penalty of commuters parking further out is not a major issue. Already people <br />are using time to look for a space, and/or to shuffle; this would be replaced with walk time. The cost <br />penalty is a potential issue for some people (such as restaurant wait staff on lunchtime shifts). In <br />addition, the longer the walk from the core area, the more conscious pedestrians are of security. Some <br />businesses reportedly cannot afford to pay their staff to park. The ideal is to provide a free peripheral <br />parking lot, but it has not yet been possible to identify a suitable site. However, there are currently <br />vacant on-street spaces allowing free all-day parking, at the southern edge of the study area. <br />Future DevelopmentsFuture DevelopmentsFuture DevelopmentsFuture Developments <br />Planned downtown development are forecast to generate demand for approximately 1,700 parking <br />spaces during a typical business day. This growth cannot be accommodated solely within the <br />approximately 800 currently available spaces in the public off-street lots. As described above, some <br />private lots may be suitable for public parking, but this may not be enough to accommodate the <br />remainder of the forecast demand growth. If all the forecast developments come to fruition, additional <br />parking spaces (and/or Travel Demand Management (TDM) aimed at reducing the parking demand) <br />may therefore be needed in the future. <br />Recommended OnRecommended OnRecommended OnRecommended On----Street Parking PlanStreet Parking PlanStreet Parking PlanStreet Parking Plan <br />The Stakeholder Group recommends that the City should retain the current policy of free on-street <br />parking. The spaces should, however, follow a simpler, more understandable pattern of zones with <br />corresponding time limits, shown in Figure ES-1 below. This should include: <br />· A Core Zone with the emphasis on business loading needs, short visits to businesses (one- <br />hour parking) and accessible (ADA) spaces. <br />· An Inner Zone with the emphasis on two-hour parking, serving shoppers and other <br />downtown customers and visitors. Loading, ADA and one-hour spaces should be provided <br />where these are needed in specific locations. <br />· An Outer Zone with the emphasis on unrestricted parking. Loading, ADA and two-hour <br />spaces should be provided where these are needed in specific locations. <br />New categories of loading space are proposed, to reflect the traffic impact of commercial vehicle loading <br />as well as the fact that more loading spaces are required in the morning than in the afternoon. The <br />proposed categories are: <br />· Loading all day until 6pm (as per current designation of loading spaces). <br />· Loading all day until 6pm, then drop-off after 6pm. <br />· Loading until 11am, then one-hour parking until 6pm. <br />· Loading with Business Loading Permit all day until 6pm. <br />· Loading with Business Loading Permit until 11am, then one-hour parking until 6pm.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.