2001-12-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

228 Ms. Richards asked Council how they would feel about holding an impromptu public hearing, and Mr. Brown suggested that if Council wants to hold a public hearing, they should advertise it in advance. Mr. Toscano said he feels it is time to bring the issue to closure, and noted that the public is well aware of what the issues are. Mr. Lynch agreed with Mr. Toscano, and said that while this is not an ideal solution, it provides plenty of room to go forward. Mr. Cox agreed and said he has heard about every position he can imagine and is not sure any new arguments can be made. Mr. Cox said he would prefer to make a decision with the understanding that it is a start and may need to be fine tuned. Mr. Toscano asked about the issue of voice control, and Mr. Brown said that dogs are not allowed to run at large and are subject to the direction of the owner. Responding to a question from Mr. Cox, Mr. Pat Plocek, Parks Manager, said that when dogs reach the end ofthe loop they must be put on a leash for the remainder ofthe trail. Mr. Cox noted that the property beyond the initial loop is private property, and the easements could be revoked by the owners. Mr. Toscano made a motion to amend the ordinance to add cemeteries to the areas where leashes are required, Mr. Cox seconded the motion, and the amendment was approved by the followhag vote. Ayes: .Mr. Caravati, Mr. Cox, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Richards, Mr. Toscano. NOes: None. Ms. Richards said she will not vote in favor of the ordinance as she favors a leash law and strongly favors the creation of dogs runs. Ms. Richards said the trail system at Piedmont Virginia Community College is a possibility and she supports identifying additional sites that have access to water. Ms. Richards said she is concerned that the shared time proposal is a compromise the neighborhood did not willingly participate in and said they feel somewhat sold out. Ms: Richards said that other areas that have shared times are for much larger areas, and is concerned that the concentrated use will degrade the environment, and will make the area used ahnost exclusively by unleashed dogs. Ms. Richards said this means we are not really talking about sharing, we are talking about an alternate use. Ms. Richards said she also thinks the shared time will be unenforceable. Mr. Caravati said he will not support the ordinance with the shared time, noting that he does not think it is a very creative solution, the enforceability is questionable, and it ignores the wishes of the neighborhood. Mr. Caravati said he thinks the park is in fact a neighborhood park, and was never meant to be regional. Mr. Caravati said he is concerned about the negative impact on the environment and feels this kind of use is inappropriate for that location. He said he would like to pursue other dog parks and shared arrangements, and is willing to pursue more land at Riverview. Ms. Richards asked how we will recognize if this pilot is working,, Mr. Lynch said that he does not think this is an ideal solution, but before we can move away from this we need to have other alternatives, and noted that none of those are on the table right now. Mr. Cox said he will support the ordinance, and noted that he feels both sides came away disappointed. Mr. Cox said people will need to change their habits, and said that the neighborhood has regained the park for four days, including the weekends. He said he thinks other solutions need~to be explored. He said he is interested in evaluating the pilot in six months and exploring other alternatives. Mr. Toscano said that as part of the evaluation of the success of the pilot he would like to See counts of people using the park before and after the ordinance goes into effect, and if numbers jump on the days off leash dogs are allowed, it could be problematic. He