My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-02-16
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
1982-02-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2003 6:01:55 PM
Creation date
1/8/2003 5:05:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/16/1982
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT RE: <br />OBTAINING FINANCIAL <br />ADVISOR <br /> <br /> VOTE AGAINST THE RESOLUTION, BECAUSE HE DISAGREED WITH USING TAX <br /> EXEMPTION AS A PUBLIC SUBSIDY. HE FELT THAT SUCH A REQUEST SHOULD BE <br /> WEIGHED AGAINST OTHER REQUESTS FOR PUBLIC SUBSIDY THROUGH THE BUDGETARY <br /> <br /> PROCESS AND CI.TED PAY FOR TEACHERS AS AN EXAMPLE. MR. CONOMER STATED <br /> THAT ALTHOUGH HE WOULD VOTE NO, HE FULLY SUPPORTS THE ORGANIZATION'S <br /> EFFORTS. <br /> MRS. GLEASON ASKED IF GRANTING THE TAX EXEMPT STATUS WOULD BE A <br /> <br /> PERMANENT ACT? <br /> <br /> MR2 WILEY RESPONDED, INDICATING THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY COULD <br /> <br /> REPEAL THE EXEMPTION, BUT THAT HE HAS NEVER KNOWN THEM TD DO SO. HE <br /> <br /> STATED THAT IF IT WAS FELT THE ORGANIZATION HAD LOST ITS CHARITABLE <br /> <br /> PURPOSE, THAT WOULD CONSTITUTE GROUNDS FOR RECONSIDERATION. <br /> <br /> DR. HALL RESTATED HIS POSITION, SAYING THAT HE DOES NOT SEE <br /> <br />THE PROGRAM AS BEING A BURDEN TO THE CITY, BUT A SERVICE TO THE CITY. <br />HE FELT THAT IT WOULD BE AN INJUSTICE IF COUNCIL WERE TO TURN DOWN THE <br />REQUEST. <br /> MR. BUCK ALSO RESTATED HIS POSITION, SAYING THAT HE AGREED WITH <br /> <br />MR. CONOVER'S STATEMENT. <br /> THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: <br />AYES: MR. ALBRO, MRS. GLEASON, DR. HALL. NOES: MR. BUCK, MR. CONOVER. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, HOUSE BILL 349 CURRENTLY PENDING IN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY <br />OF VIRGINIA WOULD ADD A SECTION TO TITLE 58 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA' TO <br />CONFER TAX-EXEMPT STATUS ON HEARTHSTONE CHILDRENS' HOUSE, INC.: AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, HEARTHSTONE CHILDRENS' HOUSE, INC. HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED <br />AS A NON-STOCK, NON-PROFIT CORPORATION TO FULFILL THE CHARITABLE AND <br />BENEVOLENT OBJECTIVE OF PROVIDING HOUSING FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN <br />RECEIVING MEDICAL TREATMENT AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER~ <br />AND <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, THE COUNCIL FINDS THAT HEARTHSTONE CHILDRENS' HOUSE, INC: <br /> <br /> IS EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL TAXATION PURSUANT TO SECTION <br /> 501(C) OF THE ~NTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1954s <br /> <br /> 2) HOLDS NO CURRENT[LICENSE FROM THE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL <br /> BOARD~ <br /> <br /> 3) PAYS NO COMPENSATION TO ANY OFFICER OR DIRECTOR IN EXCESS <br /> OF REASONABLE ALLOWANCE FOR SERVICES RENDEREDI <br /> <br /> DOES NOT DISTRIBUTE ANY PART OF ITS NET EARNINGS TO <br /> ANY INDIVIDUAL AND GENERATES A SUBSTANTIAL PART DF <br /> ITS FUNDS FROM PRIVATE DONATIONS~ <br /> <br /> 5) PROVIDES SERVICES FOR THE COMMON GOOD OF THE PUBLICs <br /> <br /> 6) DOES NOT CARRY ON SUBSTANTIAL ACTIVITIES TO INFLUENCE <br /> LEGISLATION OR POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS~ AND <br /> <br /> 7) HAS NO RULE, REGULATION, POLICY DR PRACTICE <br /> DISCRIMINATING ON THE BASIS OF RELIGION, RACE, COLOR, SEX OR <br /> NATIONAL ORIGINs <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT THE COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ENDORSE, SUPPORT AND <br />APPROVE HOUSE BILL 349 EXEMPTING PROPERTY OF HEARTHSTONE CHILDRENS' <br />HOUSE, INC. FROM STATE AND LOCAL TAXATION. <br /> <br /> ROBERT SHEETS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE REPORTED THAT SINCE THE CITY <br /> <br />IS ABOUT TO EMBARK ON FOUR CAPITAL PROJECTS WITHIN THE NEXT EIGHTEEN <br />MONTHS, WITH AN EXPENDITURE OF APPROXIMATELY $5,000,000.00, HE PROPOSES <br />THAT A FINANCIAL ADVISOR BE OBTAINED BY THE CITY. MR. SHEETS RECOMMENDED <br />THE FIRM OF HORNER, BARKSDALE AND ASSOCIATES OF LYNCHBURG. HE STATED <br />THAT THE FIRM WOULD WORK WITH THE CITY STAFF IN PREPARING THE OFFICIAL <br />STATEMENT, PROVIDE SPECIAL CONSULTATION IN ALL RELATIVE ISSUES <br />CONCERNING THE SALE OF THE BOND ANTICIPATION NOTES, AND ENHANCE <br />MARKETABILITY OF THE CITY'S BONDS AND NOTES BY DAY-TO-DAY CONTACT WITH <br />INSTITUTIONAL AND INDIVIDUAL BUYERS. MR. SHEETS INDICATED THAT THE FEE <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.